Main / Q0922Questions from the 09/22 index cards
yes, we'll use the pixels as the "unit" by which we measure width.
Um, I don't understand the question.
Convolutions
Actually, its a weighted moving average. If you had all the weights be 1/N, then it would be a moving average. (for each point, you average over the neighborhood that "moves" with the point)
I'm not sure what is most common - probably renormalization, since its not a lot of work, cures a bunch of other issues, and gives good results.
no, the range can be centered everywhere. for most cases, the center should be zero.
Filters and Kernels
Extent is the amount of the kernel that is not zero. "width" (as I am using it in class) is the size of the "main bump" of a low pass filter, roughly inversely proportional to the cutoff frequency. Generally, the extent is a multiple of the width, where a larger multiple is used for a higher-quality filter.
Yes. The cutoff frequency is roughly inversely proportional to the width (which for sinc is where it crosses zero)
All filters have tradeoffs in computation, how well they preserve sharpness, and how
Yes! if you use too wide a LPF, you'll do more blurring than is necessary, which will lead to a blurrier image than you might like.
A B-Spline can actually be any order. Usually, for filtering the cubic is used.
Many programs, like photoshop, offer several options. Cubic filters (particularly Mitchell-Netravali) are really common in practice.
Sometimes, you use a sharper (ringing) kernel for upsampling and a blurring kernel (gaussian, bspline) for downsampling.
2D Kernels (seperability, ...)
Being symmetric is a necessary, but insufficient condition for being seperable.
correct
Beyond what we're doing
Just as 2D extends 1D, 3D extends it as well - all the squares becomes cubes, etc.
Sortof. Basically, saying that noise is high frequencies is an imperfect approximation. If you just blur everything, then you make everything blurry - not just blurring out the noise. This might be OK. Or not.
Yes. Except that they usually don't have a mechanical shutter.
Painting
Fourier Transforms
The latter is easy to show (DC value). The former is a wierdness of how the integrals work out - see a signal processing book.
|